High-Risk Medications in Persons Living With Dementia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Published in JAMA Internal Medicine, December 1, 2024 | Online publication on October 21, 2024

Author(s): Sonal Singh, Xiaojuan Li, Noelle M Cocoros, Mary T Antonelli, Ramya Avula, Sybil L Crawford, Inna Dashevsky, Hassan Fouayzi, Thomas Harkins, Kathleen M Mazor, Ashley I Michnick, Lauren E Parlett, Mark Paullin, Richard Platt, Paula A Rochon, Cassandra Saphirak, Mia Si, Yunping Zhou, Jerry Gurwitz

DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.5632 | Pubmed ID: 39432286

Abstract

Visual abstract showing the population of older adults with mean age 77.3, two large health plans, mailed intervention, and findings of no difference in filled prescriptions.
Visual abstract. Copyright held by American Medical Association. All rights reserved. 

 

Importance: Individuals with Alzheimer disease (AD) and Alzheimer disease-related dementias (ADRD) may be at increased risk for adverse outcomes relating to inappropriate prescribing of certain high-risk medications, including antipsychotics, sedative-hypnotics, and strong anticholinergic agents.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of a patient/caregiver and prescriber-mailed educational intervention on potentially inappropriate prescribing to patients with AD or ADRD.

Design, setting, and participants: This prospective, open-label, pragmatic randomized clinical trial, embedded in 2 large national health plans, was conducted from April 2022 to June 2023. The trial included patients with AD or ADRD and use of any of 3 drug classes targeted for deprescribing (antipsychotics, sedative-hypnotics, or strong anticholinergics).

Interventions: Patients were randomized to 1 of 3 arms: (1) a mailing of educational materials specific to the medication targeted for deprescribing to both the patient and their prescribing clinician; (2) a mailing to the prescribing clinician only; or (3) a usual care arm.

Main outcomes and measures: Analysis was performed using a modified intention-to-treat approach. The primary study outcome was the dispensing of the medication targeted for deprescribing during a 6-month study observation period. Secondary outcomes included changes in medication-specific mean daily dose and health service utilization.

Results: Among 12 787 patients included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis, 8742 (68.4%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 77.3 (9.4) years. The cumulative incidence of being dispensed a medication targeted for deprescribing was 76.7% (95% CI, 75.4-78.0) in the patient and prescriber mailing group, 77.9% (95% CI, 76.5-79.1) in the prescriber mailing only group, and 77.5% (95% CI, 76.2-78.8) in the usual care group. Hazard ratios were 0.99 (95% CI, 0.94-1.04) for the patient and prescriber group and 1.00 (95% CI, 0.96-1.06) for the prescriber only group compared with the usual care group. There were no differences between the groups for secondary outcomes.

Conclusions and relevance: These findings suggest medication-specific educational mailings targeting patients with AD or ADRD and their clinicians are not effective in reducing the use of high-risk medications.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05147428

Tags

Analytic: survival analysis

Data Source: claims | intervention | sentinel common data model

Research Focus: deprescribing

Study Design: pragmatic clinical trial

Funding Transparency

This work was possible through:

Additional details:

Entry last updated (DMY): 21-12-2024.